The Big Question

The skills shortage in construction is well documented. With women now counting for 45% of the UK's workforce, can we really excuse the fact that only 10% of construction employees are women? Worse still, less than 2% of those in the industry hold jobs outside traditionally female roles.

So why aren't we seeing more women on sites? Well, among other reasons many point to construction's macho image (others included high fatality rates, long hours, dirty conditions and travel). And it's not just women who highlighted this. Many men did too. It's a point of difference that directly reflects the nation's desire for equality in the workplace.

Whilst the government has put forward initiatives to encourage women into construction, the lack of current role models and increased pressure in what's already a high-stress environment can lead to low retention rates. Often, the reasons women give for leaving individual companies and the industry in general is that there is a lack of support and understanding.

Men and women are designed to compliment each other and it is fairly obvious that any environment with a high percentage of either sex is bound to come into problems. All-female environments are often described as catty, emotional and gossip-ridden. Predominantly male environments are seen as aggressive, argumentative and unfeeling. These are hugely stereotypical notions, but they shouldn't be completely disregarded.

Studies have shown that typically, males are more adept at problem solving, influencing upwards and delegating. Females are generally better at supporting, rewarding, mentoring, networking, consulting, team building and inspiring. (Study, 2005 by Catalyst, Women take care, men take charge)

So, with women holding the natural advantage in these areas, it's not just a question of 'doing the right thing'; attracting more women into construction also makes solid business sense.